The Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Ibrahim Lamuwa, has denied making advances on any of his subordinate in the Ministry. He, therefore, described as fake, reports making rounds that he made sexual advances towards Mrs. Simisola Fajemirokun Ajayi of his ministry.
This was contained in a letter the embattled Lamuwa wrote through his lawyers denying the allegation of sexual harassment. The Perm Sec stated that Mrs. Ajayi misinterpreted their conversation.
Recall that the Foreign Affairs Minister, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, had written a letter to the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, HoS, over allegation of sexual assault on Mrs. Simisola Fajemirokun Ajayi by the Permanent Secretary, Ambassador Ibrahim Lamuwa.
The Minister advised the HoS of the Federation to handle the matter, accordingly, promising to assist in the investigation.
But in a letter from the legal representatives of the Perm Sec, the lawyers stated, “We are legal representatives of Ambassador Ibrahim Lamuwa (hereinafter referred to as “our client”), the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. And have been authorized to make the following statements on his behalf. In response to allegations of sexual harassment levelled against him by Mrs. Simisola O. Fajemirokun-Ajayi, an aide to the Honorable Minister of Foreign Affairs.
“The media, particularly the social media has been inundated with the digital copy of a petition written by legal representatives of Mrs. Simisola O. Fajemirokun-Ajayi against Amb. Lamuwa. This petition was clearly leaked in order to generate sympathy for her unsubstantiated claims.
“We wish to state categorically that our client has never made any sexual advances towards Mrs. Simisola O. Fajemirokun-Ajayi. Who he is aware is a married woman. Neither has he ever made suggestive comments or innuendos that requested any form of untoward relationship between himself and her.
“Our client distinctly recalls the events that took place at the ministry’s retreat on October 7, 2023. Where Mrs. Simisola O. Fajemirokun-Ajayi claims that he invited her to his room. Our client states categorically that, he never made such an invitation. And that his only communication with Mrs. Fajemirokun-Ajayi, which was an overt one, was where he checked on her. Like he did to all participants on whether they had been well-lodged in their hotels.
“He further recalls that the instance where he spoke of her as a nursing mother. That was during the same retreat was in a colloquial conversation they were having with other participants. Where one participant even responded jokingly that when a woman says, “her baby”, it could mean either her husband or one of her children. Of which, he innocuously joked asking “how big is the baby?”. Our client maintains that those conversations were made jokingly. Therefore, sees their misinterpretation as malicious and with ill-intent.
“Our client also maintains that it is an absurdity for Mrs. Fajemirokun-Ajayi to claim that he invited her to Hong Kong. Given that the conversation they were both having was on how Hong Kong had digitized its work processes as far back as 1999. Our client wonders how such a conversation became interpreted as an invitation for her to travel alongside himself. Knowing fully well that she is an aide to the Minister. How can she possibly leave the Minister to follow the Permanent Secretary, on a vacation? Would that not be the height of delusion. For the one requesting, as well as the one heeding to the request?
“It is clear that the Minister’s aide had misinterpreted ordinary conversations. Made openly and in the presence of other participants, for untoward intentions. We believe that these allegations are directly tied to our client’s firm objections raised regarding improper requests that Mrs. Fajemirokun-Ajayi made, particularly to financial matters in the ministry.
“For example, Mrs. Fajemirokun-Ajayi made a trip to the World Economic Forum (Davos). Of which, she sought a reimbursement from the ministry for. Our client firmly explained to her that while the ministry may look at avenues to refund her expenses, it is not the appropriate process for a trip to be made without an approval, and then funded with taxpayers’ money.
“Further to this, is the fact of Mrs. Fajemirokun-Ajayi’s unfamiliarity with civil service rules and processes. Where she had requested from our client access to policy files and even financial records of high-level activities of the ministry. By no means, should the Permanent Secretary, as chief accounting officer of the ministry provide such sensitive documents to an aide of the Minister? Worse, via a WhatsApp chat. There are due processes in government, and they must be followed.
“We must emphasize that Mrs. Fajemirokun-Ajayi is a political appointee, and not a civil servant. Thus, matters of finance and policy are out of bounds for her in this instance.
“It is crucial to mention that our client, in all his 32 years of service in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, never received a query. Nor a report against him bordering on harassment, let alone, s*xual harassment. In the course of this period, our client has served in Hong Kong, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Syria and more recently, Senegal. And there has never been a negative report on his conduct in any of these countries.
“Ambassador Lamuwa has also served for nine years in the State House. From the office of the Vice President to the office of the Chief of Staff to the President, and to the office of the President. And no negative report or allegation of any kind has ever been raised against him,” the lawyers stated.
source: Vanguard
Follow us for more news on our WhatsApp News Channels @
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaC505jB4hdZ5Yx9g82U